A Kuala Lumpur private credit firm needed to work specific desks inside banks, law firms and advisers for a new fund. We built a company intelligence tool that maps each firm: the people on each desk, ranked by seniority with evidenced emails, plus what the firm has done lately and who it’s hiring.
To source deals for a new fund, a Kuala Lumpur private equity and private credit firm needed the people on specific desks inside 63 target firms, not just who works there. Finding them by hand meant LinkedIn trawling, guessed emails and lists that went stale. We built a company intelligence tool that maps a firm and desk in about 7 minutes, alongside the firm’s latest deals and open roles, at about US$0.05 per qualified contact, with zero guessed emails. It was in daily use five weeks after the brief.
A big bank has tens of thousands of staff. The desk the fund needed was a handful, with vague titles and no public emails.
Pick a firm and a desk, press Run. Each person is screened against the team’s brief and ranked by seniority, next to the firm’s latest deals and open roles.
193 qualified desk contacts from the first 7 runs, at about US$0.05 each, with every email backed by a source.
Based on public data, the tool finds more than 90% of the people on each target desk, alongside each firm’s latest deals and open roles.
The firm and its fund aren’t named. The profile below reflects the real engagement.
A new fund meant a new target list: bankers who lend to non-bank lenders, lawyers in banking and Islamic finance practices, deal teams at advisory firms. That came to 136 firm-and-desk targets across banks, law firms, advisers, investors and industry bodies.
Malaysia’s largest bank has tens of thousands of people on LinkedIn. The desk that lends to non-bank lenders is a handful of them.
“Director” or “Vice President” doesn’t tell you which desk someone sits on, so every profile had to be read and judged.
People move on and keep the old employer on their profile, so a list could be wrong before it was finished.
Guessed addresses bounce, and every bounce eats into the sender reputation the fund needs for real outreach.
Investor relations and client coverage roles look senior, but they aren’t the people an investing desk needs to reach.
Firms list regional staff on the same pages. The fund only wanted people working in Malaysia.
This is how firms like this one usually build a target list: an analyst, firm by firm, starting again whenever the list goes stale.
The goal wasn’t more names. It was a shorter list the team could trust and act on.
Judge each person against the desk brief the team wrote, not against a keyword list.
Keep an address only if a source can back it up, and show how sure it is.
Rank every list by seniority so the people who can say yes come first.
Spend enrichment money only on people who belong on the desk.
See what each firm has just done and what it’s hiring for, so the team brings the right deal at the right time.
Every person gets a human ✓ or ✗, and every review is kept.
The firm first looked at building a full investor database from scratch and dropped it as too ambitious. What the team actually needed was narrower and harder to get: the people on this desk, at this firm, with an email they can trust.
Contact databases answer “who works at this company”, and generic AI scrapers guess. So we built a company intelligence tool where the team picks a firm and a desk and presses Run. About seven minutes later it has the people on that desk, screened against the team’s own brief and ranked by seniority. Each person has a work email only where a source can back it up, and a phone number one click away.
The firm’s Google Sheet stays the system of record. Every run uses the firm’s own data-provider accounts, so it sees every cent and owns the data.
The team works from the target list they already wrote. The automation finds, screens and enriches the people. The team reviews the result and decides who to approach.
The tool does the finding, screening and checking. People decide who is right for the desk and who to approach.
A list of names only tells you who to call. A private credit firm bringing a deal to a bank, law firm or adviser needs to know where that firm is moving: what it has just done, which desks it’s building, and what it has the capacity for. That direction is one of the strongest signals there is for which deal to bring, to whom, and when.
A bank that has just led a syndicated financing has a live team and an appetite for that kind of deal. That’s the moment to bring a similar one.
A firm hiring into leveraged finance or Islamic banking is building that desk, and it will need deal flow to keep the new team busy.
A new head of a desk often arrives with a new mandate and wants early wins. That makes them one of the most open doors in the firm.
A new fund, financing programme or office means fresh capacity, and often a market the firm is actively trying to grow in.
Every firm gets its own page. Next to the people on each desk, it shows what the firm has been doing lately, read from its own LinkedIn posts and the news.
Finding names is the easy part. These are the parts that make the list worth acting on.
The AI reads each person’s current role against the desk brief the team wrote in their own words, and returns Yes, Maybe or No with a written reason.
An address is kept only if a source can back it up, and it’s labelled Verified, Found or Likely. We tested pattern guessing and rejected it. With no evidence, the field stays blank.
When a firm publishes its team, that page outranks what people say on LinkedIn. Anyone found only on LinkedIn is labelled “LinkedIn only” so the team knows to check.
Investor relations and client coverage roles are kept off investing desks, regional staff are filtered out, and the most senior people always stay on the list.
Every run checks for free whether a direct number exists. The team pays US$0.20 only for the numbers they choose to reveal.
Every person carries one of six seniority levels, from board and C-suite down to support. Lists put decision-makers at the top, and paid enrichment goes to them first.
Three versions, each shaped by the client testing the one before it on their real target list.
Narrowed the brief from a full investor database to desk-level contacts. Early tests showed searches were missing most of each firm. Better queries took one test from 1 profile found to 13.
A Google Sheet-driven tool with one source and evidenced emails, handed to the team to try on real targets.
Four sources searched together, an AI screen built on the team’s desk brief, emails paid for only when a person fits, and a live dashboard. Moved onto the client’s own accounts.
Company pages, seniority ranking, rules for investing desks, ✓ / ✗ reviews with a permanent log, similar firms, open roles, phones on request and spend by feature.
The AI only judges data it was given. It never invents a person or an address.
The same building blocks can be put together for your own target lists and research.
Target lists, enrichment and outreach tracking that keep pace with your pipeline.
Learn more →Live dashboards for runs, coverage and spend, updated as the work happens.
Learn more →LinkedIn data, contact providers, AI and Google Sheets connected into one system.
Learn more →See the full range of AI automation we build across sourcing, operations and data.
Browse all →